APRILASIA BUSINESS OUTLOOK19Employees who use weak or repeated passwords unknowingly open doors to the company for attackers. This single behavioural factor often determines the difference between a close call and a costly compromise.and breach databases for leaked company-related email addresses. Early detection allows teams to force password resets or suspend affected accounts before damage occurs.Third, build a zero trust security at every level in the organization. At employee level, this means never trusting any email, message or call that asks for any sensitive data without verifying first. At policy level, this means that every access request should be verified continuously, not just once at login. Verification should depend on context, like device type, location, user behaviour etc and not just credentials. In short, trust should never be assumed; it should always be earned.How does employee password hygiene impact overall organizational security and risk management?Employees who use weak or repeated passwords unknowingly open doors to the company for attackers. This single behavioural factor often determines the difference between a close call and a costly compromise.When password hygiene is poor, it undermines even the most advanced infrastructure. You can have firewalls, encryption, and zero-trust architecture, but if someone logs in with `Welcome@123,' the system is only as strong as that password.We have, unfortunately, seen this very recently. The first instance was of the Rajkot maternity home where videos of women being examined in gynaecology wards were obtained from CCTV footage and sold on Telegram. The password to the cloud-based CCTV dashboard of the hospital was `Admin123'. Then came the revelation that in the post-robbery investigation at the Louvre. The password to their video surveillance system was `Louvre'.Good hygiene is when employees understand that a single careless act, such as using the same password across a work email and a personal shopping site, can bridge two unrelated systems in ways that no hacker could plan for even in his wildest dreams.What role does technology, such as AI-driven monitoring or password vaults, play in preventing breaches?Technology doesn't replace good behaviour, but it strengthens it. Artificial intelligence and automation have become essential for identifying patterns that humans can't see.For instance, AI-driven monitoring can track login behaviour in real time, like noticing that an employee is suddenly signing in from a new country or device, or that multiple failed attempts are coming from a device or location. This kind of adaptive threat intelligence and response is crucial when credentials from old breaches are being tested constantly by bots.Password vaults and managers generate and store unique, complex passwords so employees don't have to come up with new ones every time and remember them. This removes the need for weak, repeatable passwords and saves bandwidth for actual work.Again, none of this would work without basic cyber-hygiene and awareness among the employees. AI-driven monitoring would fail if your employees don't act on the measures you recommend after a hacking attempt is detected. Password vaults are as good as expensive locks left open, if employees use the same password for more than one account.How should leadership balance security investments with operational efficiency to protect against old password breaches?Cybersecurity leadership often struggles between spending on security and spending on growth. But in today's environment, security is growth. Every modern business runs on trust, be it from customers, investors, and employees alike. A single breach can damage years of credibility, while good security practices build long-term confidence.The balance comes from integration. Security should not sit as a separate expense. Instead, it should be woven into operational design. For example, investing in single sign-on (SSO) and MFA doesn't slow down workflows. It actually speeds up access while strengthening authentication, so it boosts your productivity as well as cybersecurity at the same time. This, however, will only happen if the outlook towards cybersecurity and its enforcers changes. Leadership must treat cybersecurity not as an IT function but as a culture. A CEO or department head doesn't need to know every encryption protocol, but they must understand the behavioural side of risk: complacency, password fatigue, or poor training. These are all leadership challenges and not technical ones, and can only be solved at the leadership level.
< Page 9 | Page 11 >